Religious Freedom Lawsuit: Will It Survive in Court?

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hobby Lobby v.

Burwell, which struck down the religious exemption provision in the Affordable Care Act, and a slew of other Supreme Court rulings that have allowed for discrimination based on religious beliefs, many conservatives and faith-based organizations are increasingly concerned about the impact that a similar ruling could have on their businesses.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for example, has warned that the ruling could lead to a wave of lawsuits against religious businesses, citing the need to maintain religious freedom for individuals and businesses. 

“If the government is allowed to use its tax dollars to make businesses more religious, it will not be the same as if businesses were not allowed to exist,” Chamber President and CEO Kevin McBride said in a statement to Reuters.

“It will not stop the attacks on faith.

It will only make the attacks against the faith more vicious and harmful.”

But the fear isn’t unfounded, according to experts who have studied the impact of the Hobby Lobby ruling on the legal rights of Americans. 

The U.N. Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion and belief, Juan Pablo Moya, said in December that the Supreme Courts decision to strike down the provision “will make the future of religious freedom a much bigger issue.”

“For some people, the Hobby Law is a new normal.

For others, the Supreme courts decision is not the first time that a U.K. court has struck down a British law,” Moya said.

“And for those of us who have been fighting for religious freedom in the U.KS, we are concerned.” 

As the Supreme court weighs whether to hear the case, religious liberty advocates are taking a number of steps to protect their religious freedom, including asking the justices to block the case from reaching the U: Supreme Court rules that religious organizations must be free to operate as they see fit. 

This is a step that I believe is crucial in this fight and the fight against discrimination. 

It is a victory for religious liberty, but it is a huge victory for the First Amendment. 

There are many ways to get religious freedom.

It’s really the only way. 

We have to find new ways to protect our freedom to worship and practice our faith, Moya added. 

But in a post on his website titled “Hobby Lobby: Will Religious Freedom Survive in the Court?” the lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, Anthony Guglielmi, wrote that while there is no reason to expect a “total victory for freedom of conscience in the Hobby ruling, the case itself raises questions about what a fair and neutral law would look like.”

“It is important to remember that this is a case where the government acted to enforce a religious law against a private organization.

That’s the big picture,” he wrote.

“The Hobby Lobby decision is the culmination of a series of legal decisions that have already led to the government being allowed to discriminate against Americans on the basis of their religious beliefs.

This is a decision that we are in a very important part of.

It is not just a question of how to protect religious freedom under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

We are also in a decision about what kind of society we want to live in.”

Gugliermi wrote that, given the Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling, “there is no guarantee that the religious freedom protected by the First or Fourteenth Amendment will survive Hobby Lobby.” 

“For example, a law that allows the government to deny service to a woman on the grounds of her sexual orientation would likely be found to violate the Establishment Clause, since it would discriminate against women on the religious basis of sex,” he added.

While the Hobby case is expected to go to the Supreme to be heard in the coming weeks, it is likely to be one of the first cases the court will hear in the next few months, according the National Conference of State Legislatures.””

But even in these situations, Hobby Lobby does not appear to be a case that provides us with a free-for-all of religious liberty protections under the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses,” Guggielmi said. 

While the Hobby case is expected to go to the Supreme to be heard in the coming weeks, it is likely to be one of the first cases the court will hear in the next few months, according the National Conference of State Legislatures.

“The Supreme Court has a significant and long-term interest in upholding the right of people to hold private businesses accountable for violating their religious conscience,” the organization said in an emailed statement.

“However, given Hobby Lobby, it may well be that the Court will look back at these cases with the same caution and caution as when it took up the case of Hobby Lobby.

It would be premature to draw any firm conclusions about the Supreme’s view of the future.” 

Hobby, the first of four lawsuits challenging the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), has already brought more than $200 million in lawsuits in court, and is currently facing at least two more.

In January, the 9